Phoenix/WinNonlin: not confirmed [RSABE / ABEL]
Hi Helmut,
When I switched to FA0(1) then it worked. using FA0(1):
AUCt: 96.77% 91.88-101.93%
AUCi: 99.71% 95.25-104.38%
So same as yours
FA0(2) works for AUCi but no convergence for AUCt.
For AUCi, results with FA0(2) was the same as FA0(1).
Question is why FA0(2) didn't work?
I am not a saint in statistics yet so I don't know 
Yes, they didn't listen and went with 3/4 of the subjects (of this current panel) last time, guess what happened...
Thanks
John
When I switched to FA0(1) then it worked. using FA0(1):
AUCt: 96.77% 91.88-101.93%
AUCi: 99.71% 95.25-104.38%
So same as yours

FA0(2) works for AUCi but no convergence for AUCt.
For AUCi, results with FA0(2) was the same as FA0(1).
Question is why FA0(2) didn't work?


❝ seems to be a pivotal study this time?
Yes, they didn't listen and went with 3/4 of the subjects (of this current panel) last time, guess what happened...
Thanks
John
Complete thread:
- tada: Another issue with FDA's RSABE (please confirm?) jag009 2013-12-19 17:41
- Phoenix/WinNonlin: not confirmed Helmut 2013-12-20 04:13
- Phoenix/WinNonlin: not confirmedjag009 2013-12-20 17:12
- TRT|RTR or FA0(1) Helmut 2013-12-20 17:37
- TRT|RTR or FA0(1) jag009 2013-12-20 21:24
- Partial replicate crap? Really? d_labes 2013-12-23 09:18
- Partial replicate crap? Really? Helmut 2013-12-23 14:06
- TRT|RTR or FA0(1) Helmut 2013-12-20 17:37
- Phoenix/WinNonlin: not confirmedjag009 2013-12-20 17:12
- Tweak & Fiddle ElMaestro 2013-12-20 14:32
- Tweak & Fiddle jag009 2013-12-20 17:16
- Not confirmed - SAS d_labes 2013-12-23 10:14
- Phoenix/WinNonlin: not confirmed Helmut 2013-12-20 04:13