Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • not randomized!

not randomized! [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by K2K – India, 2013-10-31 11:08 (4213 d 09:47 ago) – Posting: # 11835
Views: 6,777

Dear Helmut,

❝ Why don’t you simply run two separate fully replicated three period studies – and tell us afterwards how much CV_WR differed between the two?

❝ T1 R T1 T2 R T2

❝ R T1 R R T2 R

After Completion of Study I will Share the CV_WR.

Thanks for your valuable suggestions.

Thanks and Regards
K2k

Complete thread:

Three Formulation - Partial Replicate K2K 2013-10-18 10:05
- Three Formulation - Partial Replicate vinayshed 2013-10-28 08:42
  - Randomization? Helmut 2013-10-28 12:11
    - Randomization? vinayshed 2013-10-28 14:47
      - Randomization? Helmut 2013-10-28 15:09
        
        Randomization? K2K 2013-10-29 10:10
        
        not randomized! Helmut 2013-10-29 13:14
        
        not randomized!K2K 2013-10-31 10:08
        
        CVwr Helmut 2013-10-31 16:25

Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
146 visitors (0 registered, 146 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:55 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Only dead fish go with the current. Scuba divers' proverb

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz