Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Objective? [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2013-09-16 19:24 (4665 d 17:19 ago) – Posting: # 11500
Views: 9,664

Hi Helmut,

❝ counter-questions: What are you trying to achieve? Why do you think such a design would have advantages over RTRT|TRTR?

Can I answer? (Love to do this when i was in school, jumping to answer first hehe)

I don't like AABB, BBAA, ABBA, BAAB because of giving the same treatment (A
or B) in consecutive period. I have no choice with FDA's partial rep - ABB, BBA, ABA...

John

Complete thread:

• fully replicate design with six sequences RK 2013-09-14 12:17 
  • Objective? Helmut 2013-09-15 13:47
    • Objective?jag009 2013-09-16 17:24
    • Objective? RK 2013-09-17 13:35
      • Objective? (again) Helmut 2013-09-17 13:51
        • Question: jag009 2013-09-17 15:49
          • Imbalanced/incomplete sequences Helmut 2013-09-18 17:32
        • fully replicate design with four sequence RK 2013-09-20 13:56
          • Period effects and sequences unrelated d_labes 2013-09-23 08:44
            • Period effects and sequences unrelated RK 2013-09-24 13:16