Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Objective?

Objective? [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut – Vienna, Austria, 2013-09-15 15:47 (4670 d 04:48 ago) – Posting: # 11498
Views: 9,850

Hi RK,

counter-questions: What are you trying to achieve? Why do you think such a design would have advantages over RTRT|TRTR?

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz

[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

fully replicate design with six sequences RK 2013-09-14 12:17
- Objective?Helmut 2013-09-15 13:47
  - Objective? jag009 2013-09-16 17:24
  - Objective? RK 2013-09-17 13:35
    - Objective? (again) Helmut 2013-09-17 13:51
      - Question: jag009 2013-09-17 15:49
        
        Imbalanced/incomplete sequences Helmut 2013-09-18 17:32
      - fully replicate design with four sequence RK 2013-09-20 13:56
        
        Period effects and sequences unrelated d_labes 2013-09-23 08:44
        
        Period effects and sequences unrelated RK 2013-09-24 13:16

Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
313 visitors (0 registered, 313 guests [including 27 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas. Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz