Compound Symmetry - SASian (1) [RSABE / ABEL]
Dear Helmut,
Aye, aye Sir, here I am
.
log AUCt
log AUCinf
Please note the 'Variance' parameter in case of AUCinf.
CS Covariance matrix parameterized in Proc MIXED as:
See this post to notice that we really need 'Variance'=0 in our model (Type CS is only an approximation to that end, hoping the 'Variance' parameter is fitted with a value near zero).
So we eventually have the optimizer to tell that for AUCt. Couldn't figure out in a hurry at moment how to do that.
❝ What do you SASians get?
Aye, aye Sir, here I am

log AUCt
90% CI
PE=94.74% [ 87.49% ... 102.59%] ![[image]](img/uploaded/image28.png)
Covariance Parameter Estimates
Cov Parm Subject Group Estimate
Variance subject 0.008436
CS subject 0.1875
Residual subject tmt A 0.07150
Residual subject tmt B 0.05300
NOTE: Convergence criteria met.
log AUCinf
90% CI
PE=95.30% [ 88.32% ... 102.82%] ![[image]](img/uploaded/image32.png)
Covariance Parameter Estimates
Cov Parm Subject Group Estimate
Variance subject 0 (!)
CS subject 0.1441
Residual subject tmt A 0.07465
Residual subject tmt B 0.06088
NOTE: Convergence criteria met.
NOTE: Estimated G matrix is not positive definite.
NOTE: Asymptotic variance matrix of covariance parameter estimates has been found to be singular and a generalized inverse was used. Covariance parameters with zero variance do not contribute to degrees of freedom computed by DDFM=SATTERTH.
Please note the 'Variance' parameter in case of AUCinf.
CS Covariance matrix parameterized in Proc MIXED as:
( CS+var CS
CS CS+var)
See this post to notice that we really need 'Variance'=0 in our model (Type CS is only an approximation to that end, hoping the 'Variance' parameter is fitted with a value near zero).
So we eventually have the optimizer to tell that for AUCt. Couldn't figure out in a hurry at moment how to do that.
—
Regards,
Detlew
Regards,
Detlew
Complete thread:
- FDA's HVD SAS Code from Progesterone Guidance jag009 2013-04-22 16:39
- Proc MIXED vs. Proc GLM Helmut 2013-04-22 17:47
- Proc MIXED vs. Proc GLM jag009 2013-04-22 20:33
- SAS vs. PHX Helmut 2013-04-22 22:10
- SAS vs. PHX Shuanghe 2013-04-23 11:45
- SAS vs. SAS d_labes 2013-04-23 16:50
- SAS vs. SAS vs. Phoenix Helmut 2019-11-12 13:01
- SAS vs. SAS d_labes 2013-04-23 16:50
- SAS vs. PHX jag009 2013-04-23 15:56
- SAS Warning (Note) on Proc Mixed jag009 2013-04-23 17:07
- Nut Job.. jag009 2013-04-30 21:09
- Second opinion (PHX 6.3) Helmut 2013-05-01 16:21
- Second opinion (PHX 6.3) jag009 2013-05-01 17:16
- Second opinion (PHX 6.3) ElMaestro 2013-05-01 18:48
- In praise of a full replicate Helmut 2013-05-01 19:16
- Third opinion d_labes 2013-05-02 12:00
- Compound Symmetry Helmut 2013-05-02 14:41
- Compound Symmetry - SASian (1)d_labes 2013-05-02 16:26
- Variance=0 Helmut 2013-05-03 16:07
- Compound Symmetry - SASian (1)d_labes 2013-05-02 16:26
- Compound Symmetry Helmut 2013-05-02 14:41
- Second opinion (PHX 6.3) jag009 2013-05-01 17:16
- Second opinion (PHX 6.3) Helmut 2013-05-01 16:21
- Nut Job.. jag009 2013-04-30 21:09
- SAS Warning (Note) on Proc Mixed jag009 2013-04-23 17:07
- SAS vs. PHX Shuanghe 2013-04-23 11:45
- SAS vs. PHX Helmut 2013-04-22 22:10
- Proc MIXED vs. Proc GLM jag009 2013-04-22 20:33
- Proc MIXED vs. Proc GLM Helmut 2013-04-22 17:47