Data set? [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2013-04-30 22:06 (4806 d 03:14 ago) – Posting: # 10513
Views: 5,224

Thanks Helmut,

Yes the saga continues, same beast... The question is when we run Proc GLM, we use the MSE (there is only 1 which is a composite of both test and reference since it's a T vs R study) to get the intrasubject CV and eventually work out the 90% CI goal post. With Proc Mixed in a partial rep study (T vs R vs R), as shown in my first post with the Covariance Matrix, there are two residuals, one for test and one for reference. Is the test residual similar to the total MSE we get from a T vs R study (Meaning the value is attributed to both products)?

I will post the same dataset (more subjects since I have 100% data). It's even stranger now... Stay tune :-)

PS. Please see my original post (the one which I posted the data).

Thanks
John

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
353 visitors (0 registered, 353 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:20 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t compromise yourself.
You are all you’ve got.    Janis Joplin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5