FDA's HVD SAS Code from Progesterone Guidance [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by jag009  – NJ, 2013-04-22 18:39 (4404 d 03:12 ago) – Posting: # 10458
Views: 29,897

Hi everyone,

I am getting some strange results using the FDA Progesterone Scaled Average Bioequivalence SAS Code → The portion to compute the Unscaled Average 90% C.I.

PROC MIXED
data=pk;
CLASSES SEQ SUBJ PER TRT;
MODEL LAUCT = SEQ PER TRT/ DDFM=SATTERTH;
RANDOM TRT/TYPE=FA0(2) SUB=SUBJ G;
REPEATED/GRP=TRT SUB=SUJ;
ESTIMATE 'T vs. R' TRT 1 -1/CL ALPHA=0.1;
ods output Estimates=unsc1;
title1 'unscaled BE 90% CI - guidance version';
title2 'AUCt';
run; data unsc1;
set unsc1;
unscabe_lower=exp(lower);
unscabe_upper=exp(upper);
run;


Should the Test/Reference Ratio from the Scaled Average BE computation be similar (if not the same) as the ratio computed from the above Unscaled Average BE code?

Thanks
John


Edit: Category changed. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,669 registered users;
194 visitors (0 registered, 194 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:52 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No matter what side of the argument you are on,
you always find people on your side
that you wish were on the other.    Thomas Berger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5