More confusion [RSABE / ABEL]
Gentlemen...
I have the point estimate and s right, this much is certain.
Since something is wrong, I just need to figure out which n-per-sequence that would result in limits such as the lower one of 107.11:
The output is:
n1= 34 n2= 77 lower limit= 1.071095
n1= 35 n2= 72 lower limit= 1.071009
n1= 35 n2= 73 lower limit= 1.0712
n1= 36 n2= 69 lower limit= 1.071178
n1= 37 n2= 65 lower limit= 1.07102
n1= 39 n2= 60 lower limit= 1.071096
n1= 40 n2= 58 lower limit= 1.071152
n1= 41 n2= 56 lower limit= 1.071138
n1= 42 n2= 54 lower limit= 1.071052
n1= 44 n2= 51 lower limit= 1.071036
n1= 45 n2= 50 lower limit= 1.071145
n1= 50 n2= 45 lower limit= 1.071145
n1= 51 n2= 44 lower limit= 1.071036
n1= 54 n2= 42 lower limit= 1.071052
n1= 56 n2= 41 lower limit= 1.071138
n1= 58 n2= 40 lower limit= 1.071152
n1= 60 n2= 39 lower limit= 1.071096
n1= 65 n2= 37 lower limit= 1.07102
n1= 69 n2= 36 lower limit= 1.071178
n1= 72 n2= 35 lower limit= 1.071009
n1= 73 n2= 35 lower limit= 1.0712
n1= 77 n2= 34 lower limit= 1.071095
So, realistic n1 and n2 add up to irrelevant values, therefore I might be inclined to believe the problem must be one of these lines:



I have the point estimate and s right, this much is certain.
Since something is wrong, I just need to figure out which n-per-sequence that would result in limits such as the lower one of 107.11:
for (n1 in 30:80)
for (n2 in 30:80)
{
df=n1+n2-2
ct = qt(1-0.05, df)
lnL=lnPE-s*ct*sqrt(0.25*(1/n1+1/n2))
if (exp(lnL)>1.0710)
if (exp(lnL)<1.0712) cat("n1=", n1, "n2=",n2, "lower limit=", exp(lnL), "\n")
}
The output is:
n1= 34 n2= 77 lower limit= 1.071095
n1= 35 n2= 72 lower limit= 1.071009
n1= 35 n2= 73 lower limit= 1.0712
n1= 36 n2= 69 lower limit= 1.071178
n1= 37 n2= 65 lower limit= 1.07102
n1= 39 n2= 60 lower limit= 1.071096
n1= 40 n2= 58 lower limit= 1.071152
n1= 41 n2= 56 lower limit= 1.071138
n1= 42 n2= 54 lower limit= 1.071052
n1= 44 n2= 51 lower limit= 1.071036
n1= 45 n2= 50 lower limit= 1.071145
n1= 50 n2= 45 lower limit= 1.071145
n1= 51 n2= 44 lower limit= 1.071036
n1= 54 n2= 42 lower limit= 1.071052
n1= 56 n2= 41 lower limit= 1.071138
n1= 58 n2= 40 lower limit= 1.071152
n1= 60 n2= 39 lower limit= 1.071096
n1= 65 n2= 37 lower limit= 1.07102
n1= 69 n2= 36 lower limit= 1.071178
n1= 72 n2= 35 lower limit= 1.071009
n1= 73 n2= 35 lower limit= 1.0712
n1= 77 n2= 34 lower limit= 1.071095
So, realistic n1 and n2 add up to irrelevant values, therefore I might be inclined to believe the problem must be one of these lines:
df=n1+n2-2
ct = qt(1-0.05, df)
lnL=lnPE-s*ct*sqrt(0.25*(1/n1+1/n2))



—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Complete thread:
- EMA dataset 1 trouble ElMaestro 2013-04-08 20:23
- complete (RR) only Helmut 2013-04-09 02:37
- EMA dataset 1 - programmers trouble d_labes 2013-04-09 09:01
- Still not exactly sure ElMaestro 2013-04-09 10:12
- Still not exactly sure - why d_labes 2013-04-09 15:57
- My problem(s) ElMaestro 2013-04-09 16:39
- More confusionElMaestro 2013-04-09 23:29
- Confusion help d_labes 2013-04-10 10:51
- Still not exactly sure - why d_labes 2013-04-09 15:57
- Still not exactly sure ElMaestro 2013-04-09 10:12