RR data only? [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-02-19 13:51 (4467 d 17:36 ago) – Posting: # 10055
Views: 4,216

Hi John,

good points!

❝ For #2, I spoke with one CRO and they said they do not include those subjects in the overall BE statistics (SABE or BE). However, they said the subjects data will be included in determining the withinsubject standard deviation (variation). I think we should not include those subjects at all or their data should be included in all stats if they are included in the determination of witinsubject variaton. Suggestion?


Including subjects with only RR data would probably give a more precise estimate of CVWR. However, personally I would not include them (see below).

❝ For #1, subject should be kept for all statistics. Agree?


I can only speak from the European perspective.

Ideally, all treated subjects should be included in the statistical analysis. However, subjects in a crossover trial who do not provide evaluable data for both of the test and reference products […] should not be included.


Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
88 visitors (0 registered, 88 guests [including 55 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:28 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t undertake a project
unless it’s manifestly important
and nearly impossible.    Edwin H. Land

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5