Brave New World (no pun!) [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2013-01-22 11:51 (4889 d 13:16 ago) – Posting: # 9896
Views: 5,187

Hi Helmut,

thanks for posting. I think this is a step in the right direction. To me meffud B and C are pretty similar in terms of the work needed to plan and conduct the study, and since the two meffuds have nearly equal performance I have little or no preference myself. I am just happy FDA is giving one of them the green light.

Now we just need some considerations over stoping criteria and higher target power than 80% :-D and oooohh aaah parallel studies.

Have a great day.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
141 visitors (0 registered, 141 guests [including 54 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:08 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking.    Stuart J. Pocock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5