Ach du lieber [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2012-10-23 22:51 (4624 d 23:36 ago) – Posting: # 9455
Views: 7,014

Hi Helmut,


❝ Not quite. You are mixing two things up, IMHO. T/R is an assumption – not “known”.


Not quite. You are mixing two things up, IMHO :-D
When we do simulations, we know the exact T/R we are simulating. This is the situation I am talking about here. My question is not related to the situation of an applicant conducting a two-stage trial when T/R is estimated and never known.
My thought was prolly a bad idea anyway. A shift in T or R (location?!) will affect the minimised SS, albeit if we tamper with it that way I no longer know if the resulting s derived from minimisation of SS will be unbiased. In principle the latter issue is of less importance for me if it turns out the type I error or power is improved.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
25 visitors (0 registered, 25 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5