Tough job [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by GSD – Canada, 2012-08-31 21:23 (5038 d 15:40 ago) – Posting: # 9136
Views: 24,750

Hi Helmut!

Thanks for the graph!

❝ Yes, but as I said at the end of my post not only the grid is too coarse, but IMHO 104 sim’s are not enough.


I actually tried both the 10^4 and 10^5 # of simulations (for about 5 different scenarios), the results are almost identical. I realized that 10^6 is a must when you go for Potvin’s 2-stage.

❝ Which one of Potvin’s methods are you aiming at?


Methods C/D.

❝ Doesn’t make sense. ln(0.8)/ln(1.25) are fixed margins and we are testing for no inflation there. 0.748 is outside the margin and the GMR-restriction would reject all studies.


But if any of your sample CVs exceeds 30%, the acceptance limits are widened. They are no longer fixed at 0.8 and 1.25. When you enter your simulation with a starting CV of say 35%, most of your random samples will have an acceptance limit in the neighborhood of [0.7723, 1.2948]. In this case, when you still center it on ln(0.8), the simulated “type I error” will be huge.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
177 visitors (0 registered, 177 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:03 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

“Data! Data! Data!” he cried impatiently.
“I can’t make bricks without clay!”    Arthur Conan Doyle

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5