Yeah but, no but ... [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2012-08-07 17:14 (5057 d 05:51 ago) – Posting: # 9047
Views: 17,380

Dear Detlew!

❝ ❝ […] If one follows Method B, IMHO a posteriori simulations are not necessary if the study was planned with a n1 corresponding to max. αemp.. That would mean that we are already on ‘top of the ridge’.


❝ Beeing on the ‘top of the ridge’ would mean IMHO that we are practically working with alpha1,2 = 0.0294.


Exactly. That’s what I mean by “if the study was planned with a n1 corresponding to max. αemp. above.

❝ Another rather clear message of this nice picture: Don't use n1 as low as 12 ('internal pilot' in the usual understanding of many sponsors) if the anticipated CV is >25%.


Yep. I was always preaching (though in the context of ‘classical’ pilot studies) against too small sample sizes if the anticipated CV is large.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
124 visitors (0 registered, 124 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:05 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Outside his own ever-narrowing field of specialization,
a scientist is a layman.
What members of an academy of science have in common
is a certain form of semiparasitic living.    Erwin Chargaff

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5