Yeah but, no but ... [Two-Stage / GS Designs]
Dear Detlew!
Exactly. That’s what I mean by “if the study was planned with a n1 corresponding to max. αemp.” above.
Yep. I was always preaching (though in the context of ‘classical’ pilot studies) against too small sample sizes if the anticipated CV is large.
❝ ❝ […] If one follows Method B, IMHO a posteriori simulations are not necessary if the study was planned with a n1 corresponding to max. αemp.. That would mean that we are already on ‘top of the ridge’.
❝
❝ Beeing on the ‘top of the ridge’ would mean IMHO that we are practically working with alpha1,2 = 0.0294.
Exactly. That’s what I mean by “if the study was planned with a n1 corresponding to max. αemp.” above.
❝ Another rather clear message of this nice picture: Don't use n1 as low as 12 ('internal pilot' in the usual understanding of many sponsors) if the anticipated CV is >25%.
Yep. I was always preaching (though in the context of ‘classical’ pilot studies) against too small sample sizes if the anticipated CV is large.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- two-stage design power 90% second stage Yvonne 2012-08-02 09:50
- two-stage design power 90% second stage ElMaestro 2012-08-02 10:17
- two-stage design power 90% second stage Yvonne 2012-08-02 11:47
- two-stage design power 90% second stage ElMaestro 2012-08-02 11:54
- two-stage design power 90% second stage Yvonne 2012-08-02 11:47
- two-stage design power 90% in sample size adaption d_labes 2012-08-02 10:33
- two-stage design power 90% in sample size adaption ElMaestro 2012-08-02 11:29
- two-stage design power 90% in sample size adaption Yvonne 2012-08-02 12:06
- two-stage design power 90% in sample size adaption ElMaestro 2012-08-02 16:59
- two-stage design power 90% in sample size adaption Yvonne 2012-08-02 12:06
- two-stage design power 90% in sample size adaption ElMaestro 2012-08-02 11:29
- Are simulations sufficient? …lenghty post! Helmut 2012-08-02 17:39
- adjusted alpha = 0.045 d_labes 2012-08-03 11:33
- adjusted alpha = 0.038 Helmut 2012-08-03 14:26
- adjusted alpha by sims? d_labes 2012-08-03 15:48
- Yeah but, no but, yeah but, no but… Helmut 2012-08-03 16:39
- Yeah but, no but ... d_labes 2012-08-07 14:42
- Yeah but, no but ...Helmut 2012-08-07 15:14
- Yeah but, no but ... d_labes 2012-08-07 14:42
- Yeah but, no but, yeah but, no but… Helmut 2012-08-03 16:39
- adjusted alpha by sims? d_labes 2012-08-03 15:48
- adjusted alpha = 0.038 Helmut 2012-08-03 14:26
- adjusted alpha = 0.045 d_labes 2012-08-03 11:33
- two-stage design power 90% second stage ElMaestro 2012-08-02 10:17