Add-On vs. group sequential design [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2007-07-12 18:08 (6925 d 19:38 ago) – Posting: # 887
Views: 9,205

Dear rafimmc!

❝ Can you please explain the study designs of add-on and group sequential. I couldn't understand the difference between these two study designs.


See my last post:

❝ In an Add-On design you don't adjust α; in a sequential design you are penalized for the ‘first look’, the α-level at each level depends on the stagewise sample size ratio n1:n2, and on the strategy for implementing the design (93–94% nominal CIs are common to maintain the overall type I error 0.05).


For an Add-on have a look at Section 7.4.2 of the Canadian Guideline, for a sequential design please read Gould’s paper (not only the abstract).

Details would go beyond the scope of the forum (or at least anything I would do in my free-time, maybe somebody else is willing to jump in); please consult with a biostatistician experienced in the field of BE.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
298 visitors (0 registered, 298 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:47 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5