Stopping criterion # futility rule [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2011-04-19 17:28 (5178 d 02:22 ago) – Posting: # 6924
Views: 26,433

Dear ElMaestro!

❝ ❝ There’s no stopping criterion in Potvin’s method. My protocols stated clearly that there is none in the method and were approved by the BfArM and two IECs. Experiences?


❝ Potvin's method B/C/D contain a stopping criterion. This is when you after stage 1 realise it's game over.


Agree. What IECs are used to (from phase III studies) is a maximum number of subjects, i.e., some kind of futility rule - which is not included in Potvin’s method. Sponsors may run out of steam realising that after stage 1 in 24 subjects they would have to go with another 96 in stage 2.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
41 visitors (0 registered, 41 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:50 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5