New paper (method D for PE 0.90) [Two-Stage / GS Designs]
Dear Helmut, dear all,
This sentence of the paper is confusing me somewhat
.
As far as I had understood the method D is a variant of method C with adjusted alpha level.
Moreover I don't share the authors view of "excessive inflation of Type I error rate".
In view of other Type I inflation allowed by the FDA, f.i. the inflation around CV=30% for the scaled ABE up to 6.5%-7% due to the regulatory sw0=0.25 (see this presentation, page 23) I would consider the inflations observed in the paper (max. 0.0547) marginal.
What makes me also wondering is that the alpha "inflation" is shifted to higher stage 1 number of subjects if the variability increases. This is somehow counter-intuitive to me. Small is beautiful?
❝ ... It might be possible to adjust the α level for methods B/C as well, but this has not been evaluated yet.
This sentence of the paper is confusing me somewhat

As far as I had understood the method D is a variant of method C with adjusted alpha level.
Moreover I don't share the authors view of "excessive inflation of Type I error rate".
In view of other Type I inflation allowed by the FDA, f.i. the inflation around CV=30% for the scaled ABE up to 6.5%-7% due to the regulatory sw0=0.25 (see this presentation, page 23) I would consider the inflations observed in the paper (max. 0.0547) marginal.
What makes me also wondering is that the alpha "inflation" is shifted to higher stage 1 number of subjects if the variability increases. This is somehow counter-intuitive to me. Small is beautiful?
—
Regards,
Detlew
Regards,
Detlew
Complete thread:
- Potvin method B subtleties d_labes 2011-01-31 14:24
- Potvin method B subtleties jdetlor 2011-02-01 17:17
- Potvin method B subtleties d_labes 2011-02-02 09:15
- Potvin method B subtleties jdetlor 2011-02-02 16:08
- Potvin method B subtleties d_labes 2011-02-02 09:15
- Another one ... d_labes 2011-02-07 14:32
- Oops! Helmut 2011-02-07 15:24
- Oops! d_labes 2011-02-07 16:29
- Oops! Helmut 2011-02-07 16:47
- Oops! ElMaestro 2011-02-07 17:06
- Simul'ants in my pants d_labes 2011-02-08 09:07
- Need for speed... ElMaestro 2011-02-13 10:57
- Need for speed... d_labes 2011-02-15 14:06
- Need for speed... ElMaestro 2011-02-15 17:39
- Pocock alpha's d_labes 2011-02-16 09:18
- ElMaestro's brain ElMaestro 2011-02-16 09:32
- ElMaestro's brain d_labes 2011-02-16 10:05
- ElMaestro's brain ElMaestro 2011-02-16 12:07
- Numbers d_labes 2011-02-16 13:45
- ElMaestro's brain ElMaestro 2011-02-16 12:07
- ElMaestro's brain d_labes 2011-02-16 10:05
- ElMaestro's brain ElMaestro 2011-02-16 09:32
- Pocock alpha's d_labes 2011-02-16 09:18
- Need for speed... ElMaestro 2011-02-15 17:39
- Need for speed... d_labes 2011-02-15 14:06
- Need for speed... ElMaestro 2011-02-13 10:57
- Oops! Helmut 2011-02-07 16:47
- Oops! d_labes 2011-02-07 16:29
- Oops! Helmut 2011-02-07 15:24
- Bonus counter-question ElMaestro 2011-02-07 23:44
- Speed is the question d_labes 2011-02-08 08:36
- New paper (method D for PE 0.90) Helmut 2011-04-18 12:58
- New paper (method D for PE 0.90)d_labes 2011-04-19 08:58
- New paper (method D for PE 0.90) Helmut 2011-04-19 14:30
- New paper (method D for PE 0.90) ElMaestro 2011-04-19 14:49
- Stopping criterion # futility rule Helmut 2011-04-19 15:28
- New paper (method D for PE 0.90)d_labes 2011-04-19 08:58
- Potvin method B subtleties jdetlor 2011-02-01 17:17