Numbers [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2011-02-16 14:45 (5240 d 05:22 ago) – Posting: # 6637
Views: 26,549

(edited on 2011-02-16 15:15)

Ahoy my dear Captn,

my crowdy R code gives for n1=36, CV=30% (but only 100 000 sims):
ratio=1.25 (->alpha)
p(accept BE)= 0.041
p(accept BE, stage 1)= 0.031
% in stage 2= 80.7
mean N= 47.5

ratio=0.95 (->power)
p(accept BE)= 0.836
p(accept BE, stage 1)= 0.676
% in stage 2= 28.9
mean N= 40.7


Seems nearly the result of Potvin et. al.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
35 visitors (0 registered, 35 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:08 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5