Pocock alpha's [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2011-02-16 10:18 (5595 d 14:50 ago) – Posting: # 6631
Views: 31,310

Ahoy ElMaestro,

❝ However, I do not have an understanding of the way Potvin et al. derive their alpha values - ...


Here we are already two :-D.

As far as I understood: The alpha's are taken from the literature about group-sequential designs, especially the Pocock boundaries. See this nice presentation for an illustration.
The boundaries and alphas were derived based on All these preconditions do not hold for BE testing with an interim sample size adaption! Nevertheless they used the alpha's and succeeded in showing that the overall alpha is bounded at 0.05.
In that sense the alphas are purely empirical, I think.
The real alphas you can take from your simulations. Count the accepted simulated studies at each stage for the simulations with GMR=1.25 or 0.80.

So far the opinion of an "interested amateur" (cit. HS) in statistics.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
137 visitors (0 registered, 137 guests [including 51 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:08 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking.    Stuart J. Pocock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5