Pocock alpha's [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2011-02-16 10:18 (5240 d 09:50 ago) – Posting: # 6631
Views: 26,726

Ahoy ElMaestro,

❝ However, I do not have an understanding of the way Potvin et al. derive their alpha values - ...


Here we are already two :-D.

As far as I understood: The alpha's are taken from the literature about group-sequential designs, especially the Pocock boundaries. See this nice presentation for an illustration.
The boundaries and alphas were derived based on All these preconditions do not hold for BE testing with an interim sample size adaption! Nevertheless they used the alpha's and succeeded in showing that the overall alpha is bounded at 0.05.
In that sense the alphas are purely empirical, I think.
The real alphas you can take from your simulations. Count the accepted simulated studies at each stage for the simulations with GMR=1.25 or 0.80.

So far the opinion of an "interested amateur" (cit. HS) in statistics.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
34 visitors (0 registered, 34 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:09 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5