Another one ... [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2011-02-07 15:32 (5611 d 13:56 ago) – Posting: # 6567
Views: 31,473

Dear All,

Potvin et. al. describe the use of GMR = 0.95 in the sample size adaption step of their Methods B/C. If we assume a more extreme null ratio and want to calculate the empirical power at that GMR (via simulation):
Is it reasonable / mandatory to use that GMR in the sample size adaption step? :ponder:

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
161 visitors (0 registered, 161 guests [including 27 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:28 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5