Another one ... [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2011-02-07 15:32 (5249 d 04:32 ago) – Posting: # 6567
Views: 26,853

Dear All,

Potvin et. al. describe the use of GMR = 0.95 in the sample size adaption step of their Methods B/C. If we assume a more extreme null ratio and want to calculate the empirical power at that GMR (via simulation):
Is it reasonable / mandatory to use that GMR in the sample size adaption step? :ponder:

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
34 visitors (0 registered, 34 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:04 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5