Null = bioINequivalence [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2010-10-25 21:16 (5709 d 05:35 ago) – Posting: # 6078
Views: 19,800

Dear Jack!

❝ this is quite a complex question…


True.

❝ … to which I will add some more questions.


:-D

Well, I think the applicability of commonly used methods is questionable, because of the different way the Null is formulated in BE studies.

Just a quote from Potvin et al.,* after referring different approaches:

Regardless, none of the methods are validated for crossover studies and two one-sided t-tests, so there is a need to start from the beginning in considering these approaches.




Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
145 visitors (0 registered, 145 guests [including 46 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:52 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking.    Stuart J. Pocock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5