Strong Type I Error control + CI: Not yet… [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Alex – Austria, 2024-01-08 17:22 (886 d 11:19 ago) – Posting: # 23822
Views: 13,153

Hi Helmut,

thanks for confirming my understanding.

Yes, as far as I understood, the paper uses ANOVA, which caused confusion at my side and was the reason for my post. I thought that I may have missed something. But I totally agree with you, the “Two-at-a-Time” approach with unequal variances would have been the better choice (but again leading to the problem of contructing RCIs for the inverse normal combination test and the need to use Potvin's algorithms).

Hope to see you again in person soon.
Alex

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
101 visitors (0 registered, 101 guests [including 24 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:42 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking.    Stuart J. Pocock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5