true CV ≠ observed CV [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by mittyri  – Russia, 2022-06-27 19:22 (1089 d 13:13 ago) – Posting: # 23097
Views: 4,691

Hi ElMaestro,

❝ Depends on the CV, but does not depend on the estimated CV. And that's a very significant difference. You never know anything other than your estimates, i.e. the knowledge that is generated as results of your trial do not determine the (maximum) type I error.


you are right, I completely agree. We cannot base TIE estimation on the observed CV.
As Helmut noted, to be on the safe side Potvin C should gone with the wind, so the framework per se should not permit such situations for given prerequisites (or even better to go with Inverse normal)
—
Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
87 visitors (0 registered, 87 guests [including 47 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:35 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5