Still SF [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by VStus – Poland, 2016-10-07 00:53 (3180 d 23:12 ago) – Posting: # 16703
Views: 14,597

Hello Maestro,

❝ Nitpicking: you perform a 2-stage trial or a pilot trial because you do not know the variability, right? Which means the "let's say 50% power" in actuality means guessworking.


Well, when we start generic development, in best case we have only data published by Originator in NDA or SmPC, and there may be one or two trials comparing phase 3 and commercial formulation or 2x2 mg vs. 1x4mg... Which we may use as inputs for our guesstimate of Intra-subject CV. We never know it in advance. T/R is also just an assumption...
"Intra-subject CV is not carved in stone".

So someone can say it's always a guessworking untill we receive data from our own trial(s) to improve precision of it.

Regards, VStus

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
14 visitors (0 registered, 14 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:06 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5