Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Apples are pears by comparing the weight

Apples are pears by comparing the weight [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by d_labes – Berlin, Germany, 2015-12-03 10:16 (3853 d 08:03 ago) – Posting: # 15691
Views: 18,751

Dear Helmut,

❝ The line

❝ res[j, 7] <- sprintf("%.0f", max(cum))

❝ should be replaced by

❝ res[j, 7] <- sprintf("%.1f", (1-tmp1$pct_s2/100)*n[1] +


❝                                 (tmp1$pct_s2/100)*max(cum))

❝

❝ E[N]


❝             ───────────
❝ expected N   GSD    TSD
❝ ───────────────────────

❝     50      71.3   63.7

❝    100      84.6   99.2

❝ Interesting.

:confused:

What's your expected N?

BTW: ? cumsum.

—
Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Adaptive TSD vs. “classical” GSD Helmut 2015-11-27 19:05
- Adaptive TSD vs. “classical” GSD ElMaestro 2015-11-27 19:54
- “classical” GSD - E[n] d_labes 2015-11-30 11:15
  - Apples are pears by comparing the weight Helmut 2015-12-01 16:35
    - Apples are pears by comparing the weightd_labes 2015-12-03 09:16
      - Apples are pears by comparing the weight Helmut 2015-12-03 13:10
        
        Oranges d_labes 2015-12-03 13:56
- Adaptive TSD vs. “classical” GSD Ben 2015-12-02 19:27
  - Adaptive TSD vs. “classical” GSD Helmut 2015-12-03 03:11
    - “classical” GSD alpha's d_labes 2015-12-03 09:47
      - N sufficiently large‽ Helmut 2015-12-03 14:56
        
        An other one with 0.0304 d_labes 2015-12-03 16:15
        
        An other one with 0.0304 Helmut 2015-12-03 16:26
    - Adaptive TSD vs. “classical” GSD Ben 2016-01-10 12:43

Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
152 visitors (0 registered, 152 guests [including 29 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:19 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic. Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz