Apples are pears by comparing the weight [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-12-01 17:35 (3854 d 12:33 ago) – Posting: # 15685
Views: 18,812

Dear Detlew

❝ ❝ […] Much lower.

❝ Much lower than what?


TSD’s E[N] than GSD’s N.

❝ Your presentation of the GSD results is a little bit unfair. It seems that the expected N is 100.


I see.

❝ But thats not true: […]



You are absolutely right. As (almost) always. ;-) THX!

The line
  res[j,  7] <- sprintf("%.0f", max(cum))
should be replaced by
  res[j,  7] <- sprintf("%.1f", (1-tmp1$pct_s2/100)*n[1] +
                                (tmp1$pct_s2/100)*max(cum))


                E[N]   
            ───────────
expected N   GSD    TSD
───────────────────────
    50      71.3   63.7
   100      84.6   99.2

Interesting.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
134 visitors (0 registered, 134 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:08 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5