df = df-1 [Two-Stage / GS Designs]
Dear ElMaestro,
Good point! And totally correct.
But I suppose that it would be hard to find any differences in estimated sample sizes using the correct df.
There is no must to use
. But other software for SSE also lacks of this "deficiency" for nitpickers.
❝ ... Though, technically I wonder if the above function call is approximative due to the lacking subtraction of a DF.
❝ Perhaps there'd be a point in updating the package to allow for curious people and nitpickers to specify if the call forms part of a two-stage approach and needs internal subtraction of a DF.
Good point! And totally correct.
But I suppose that it would be hard to find any differences in estimated sample sizes using the correct df.
There is no must to use
PowerTOST
. Although it is termed "Gold standard" at times 
—
Regards,
Detlew
Regards,
Detlew
Complete thread:
- Sequential trial with B method of Potvin john john 2015-10-01 17:44
- Sequential trial with B method of Potvin ElMaestro 2015-10-01 17:58
- Sequential trial with B method of Potvin Helmut 2015-10-01 18:13
- Sequential trial with B method of Potvin john john 2015-10-07 11:26
- Power to the people d_labes 2015-10-07 13:49
- Power to the people john john 2015-10-07 14:54
- Software? Ethics beyond statistics… Helmut 2015-10-07 16:06
- Subtraction of a df ElMaestro 2015-10-07 21:22
- df = df-1d_labes 2015-10-08 08:10
- Subtraction of a df ElMaestro 2015-10-07 21:22
- Software? Ethics beyond statistics… Helmut 2015-10-07 16:06
- Power to the people john john 2015-10-07 14:54
- Potvin B: α 0.0294 in both stages Helmut 2015-10-08 15:27
- Potvin B: α 0.0294 in both stages john john 2015-10-23 12:04
- Power to the people d_labes 2015-10-07 13:49
- Sequential trial with B method of Potvin john john 2015-10-07 11:26