Sequential trial with B method of Potvin [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2015-10-01 19:58 (3478 d 19:27 ago) – Posting: # 15514
Views: 11,745

Hi JJ,

❝ In a sequential clinical trial conducted like a B method of Potvin, we have Cmax and AUC both not bioequivalent. Cmax has a power <80% (71.5%), and AUC>80% (84.6%).

❝ AUC 0-30min calculated by protocol is bioequivalent.

❝ In the protocol it was not specified how to proceed in this situation.


❝ Can we calculate a new n and pass to the second phase? Or we must stop the trial?


I would go by the metric that displays the highest variance, which is usually Cmax. I suggest to proceed towards stage 2 on that basis.
However, since this was not pre-specified it is your protocol that document may be your biggest issue now; regulators may not like whatever decision you take.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,422 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,667 registered users;
37 visitors (0 registered, 37 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:25 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To know the history of science is to recognize the mortality
of any claim to universal truth.    Evelyn Fox Keller

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5