Histogram beast [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2015-06-09 17:24 (3666 d 08:26 ago) – Posting: # 14934
Views: 19,578

Dear Detlew!

❝ A better way would be to return the vector of ntot (your suggestion in our correspondence) …


Well, you convinced me that it doesn’t makes sense to return such a large vector (con­sisting easily of 1 mio elements).

❝ … instead of some histogram-data with standard settings.


Maybe. Maybe not. IMHO, it is good practice to select the number of bins based on the range of data. See help(nclass.Sturges)

❝ That would give you all freedom to design the histogram to your needs.


True.

❝ Example: 100 bins in the histogram


IMHO, that’s a bit over the top. ;-)
I guess that 50 are more than enough to prescind the first stage and show the log-dis­tri­bution of sample sizes in the second stage. Well, log="x" rightly throws warnings since this is not a histogram proper any more!

[image]

❝ Note the pronounced and outstanding role of N=24, the sample size for stage 1. Not so clear seen in your pictures above for OBF or Zheng. Partly now also seen for HP.


Righty-right! With some tweaks:

[image]

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
17 visitors (0 registered, 17 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:50 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5