TSD only an option in ex­ceptional cases [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Dr_Dan  – Germany, 2015-06-02 10:00 (4028 d 10:58 ago) – Posting: # 14891
Views: 24,540

Dear all,
Thank you very much for the effort you spent to teach me where the pitfalls of a TSD study lie. Fortunately in vain (not the teaching but I just heard that the project is cancelled. I guess performing a study with a supposed CVintra of 50% for AUC and 80% for Cmax is only interesting from a scientific point of view). As you know I am not a friend of TSD and this discussion confirmed my antipathy. IMHO as long as you have a "normal" drug substance you should go with an accepted design. I would use a full replicate design with the possibility to widen the acceptance range (at least for Cmax). The savings in terms of money of a TSD (if any!) do no justify the risks.
Kind regards and thanks again
Dr_Dan

Kind regards and have a nice day
Dr_Dan

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
106 visitors (0 registered, 106 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:59 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Outside his own ever-narrowing field of specialization,
a scientist is a layman.
What members of an academy of science have in common
is a certain form of semiparasitic living.    Erwin Chargaff

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5