Does unequal alpha distribution make sense? [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Dr_Dan  – Germany, 2015-05-19 10:29 (4042 d 19:36 ago) – Posting: # 14853
Views: 26,969

Dear all
There are some People who recommend to use a very small alpha in the first stage and a large alpha in the next.

Stage I:  0.001 leading to 99.8% CI
Stage II: 0.049 leading to 90.2% CI

Chance of approval in the first go is low, but you will have a comfortable CI in the second stage. However, as I learned from our famous captain, it is almost impossible to argue that it makes a practical difference. Do you agree or disagree? What is your experience?
Looking forward to your valuable input
Kind regards
Dr_Dan

Kind regards and have a nice day
Dr_Dan

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
113 visitors (0 registered, 113 guests [including 31 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:06 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking.    Stuart J. Pocock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5