Does unequal alpha distribution make sense? [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Dr_Dan  – Germany, 2015-05-19 10:29 (4049 d 20:28 ago) – Posting: # 14853
Views: 27,006

Dear all
There are some People who recommend to use a very small alpha in the first stage and a large alpha in the next.

Stage I:  0.001 leading to 99.8% CI
Stage II: 0.049 leading to 90.2% CI

Chance of approval in the first go is low, but you will have a comfortable CI in the second stage. However, as I learned from our famous captain, it is almost impossible to argue that it makes a practical difference. Do you agree or disagree? What is your experience?
Looking forward to your valuable input
Kind regards
Dr_Dan

Kind regards and have a nice day
Dr_Dan

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
138 visitors (0 registered, 138 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:58 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I have finally come to the konklusion
that a good reliable set ov bowels
iz worth more to a man
than enny quantity of brains.    Josh Billings

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5