Interesting idea! [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Dr_Dan  – Germany, 2015-05-12 20:11 (4049 d 07:47 ago) – Posting: # 14797
Views: 6,928

Hi Helmut and ElMaestro
Maybe my question/mind was not clear enough. I just thought that it might be a possibility to allow subjects participating in stage I also to participate in stage II without fixing the subject groups. Not mandatory just as an option. Advantage: you know the subjects, the subjects know the study -> higher compliance, less drop outs. Disadvantage: the subject groups are not completely independent and I do not know the implications....
As I learned from your posts due to the repeated measurement charac­te­ris­tics which Need to be taken into account this is not possible, right?
LG
Dr_Dan

Kind regards and have a nice day
Dr_Dan

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,571 registered users;
126 visitors (0 registered, 126 guests [including 36 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:59 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking.    Stuart J. Pocock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5