Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Gimmick & survey [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Helmut  – Vienna, Austria, 2015-02-20 14:01 (3707 d 18:27 ago) – Posting: # 14471
Views: 12,517

Hi Sweden (or Germany?)

❝ ...you should publish open-source...

Everybody – who could afford it – should do so. It was an invited review and assessing the endless list of references and running the simulations took me close to two months. My one-man show didn’t want to spend € 2,200 for OA.

❝ (Springer handled the additional material .doc quite loveless, btw)

Yes.
I had some discussions with the publisher about the format of the plots in the paper only to find them downscaled making some legends almost illegible…

❝ First graph = Potvin B

❝ Second graph = Potvin C

❝ Third graph = conventional 2x2 ?

Almost – almost – yes.
Potvin’s adjusted α of 0.0294 for both methods was unfortunate. “Type 2” always needs more ad­just­ment than “type 1”. I used the optimized values of 0.0303 and 0.0282. No significant inflation of the TIE (maxima 0.05015 and 0.05010).

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! 
Helmut Schütz


The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

• Gimmick & survey Helmut 2015-02-20 01:47 
  • Gimmick & survey nobody 2015-02-20 08:25
    • Gimmick & surveyHelmut 2015-02-20 13:01
      • Gimmick & survey nobody 2015-02-20 14:18
        • Speeed! Helmut 2015-02-20 15:38
          • Speeed! nobody 2015-02-20 16:37
            • Speeed! Helmut 2015-02-20 16:58
              • Speeed! nobody 2015-02-20 17:01
          • Speeed! ElMaestro 2015-02-20 23:48
            • Speeed! Helmut 2015-02-21 01:11
              • Unrolled example ElMaestro 2015-02-21 01:32
                • Unrolled example Helmut 2015-02-21 01:50
                  • Unrolled example ElMaestro 2015-02-21 02:27
                    • Increasing vector & another example Helmut 2015-02-21 13:13
              • Speeed! nobody 2015-02-21 21:02