Interim Analysis and Power [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Emrah Soner Özdeş – Turkey, 2014-12-26 09:55 (3764 d 09:28 ago) – Posting: # 14178
Views: 7,423

Herr Schütz;

❝ Please help me understand the details. I get on basis of Cmax:

❝ PE=88.31% and CV=27.5% with N1=24, and assuming balance you'll have a power of about 65% (alpha 5%, GMR 95% as per Potvin and not 88.31%). Where did I go wrong here?


It seems that I need to check my calculations for power value since point estimator and CV values are same with the one you calculated. Could you advice a reliable formula to check my calculations ?

❝ I assume you wrote in your protocol that your way through the decision tree would be dictated by Cmax and not AUCt? You'll be going into stage 2 before declaring success or failure.


No it will be dictated by both Cmax and AUCt. Assuming that both endpoints are outside the 90% CI and power is below 80% for only one endpoint ? What would be the next step ?

Thanks in advance

Emrah

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,705 registered users;
28 visitors (0 registered, 28 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:24 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

A Camel is a Horse designed by committee.    Anonymous

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5