Interim Analysis and Power [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2014-12-25 13:32 (3832 d 11:01 ago) – Posting: # 14173
Views: 7,684

Hi Emrah,

❝ I recently performed an interim analysis of a two-stage study with Potvin Method C and here are the initial results (power evaluated with alpha level of 0.05)


❝ LN AUCT: 77.81 - 96.71 Power: 91.55%

❝ LN CMAX: 77.24 - 100.97 Power: 73.51


❝ Given below the flowchart of Potvin method C, I believe this is a fail case where second stage is not required since power of only end-point is below 80%


❝ Do you think is this the right way interpreting the results ?


I assume you wrote in your protocol that your way through the decision tree would be dictated by Cmax and not AUCt? You'll be going into stage 2 before declaring success or failure.

Please help me understand the details. I get on basis of Cmax:
PE=88.31% and CV=27.5% with N1=24, and assuming balance you'll have a power of about 65% (alpha 5%, GMR 95% as per Potvin and not 88.31%). Where did I go wrong here?

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
18 visitors (0 registered, 18 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:33 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5