Open your mouth and forcefully spit the water out [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Shuanghe  – Spain, 2013-10-22 11:03 (4214 d 08:28 ago) – Posting: # 11724
Views: 25,324

Hi Helmut,

❝ Have you asked them which methods would be acceptable according to their impeccable wisdom instead? They should enlighten us simpletons.


No, I contact them indirectly (through a colleague of mine).

❝ Yes. For some recent (this year’s) experiences see slide 45 of this presentation. Method C [sic] accepted by Germany (RMS) and CMSs Austria, Denmark, Sweden, and The Netherlands. Spain asked for an all-fixed effects analysis (subjects within sequence were random in the original analysis).


Seems the same one as I saw in Budapest in your talk this May. This is actually the very reason I wanted to ask the same question again since you have presented some studies already... Well, now we know how it goes...

❝ ... I hope someone has the balls and goes for a referral. If a GL (not a law anyway) states 2×2=5 I would wholeheartedly ignore it for sure.


If that's my own company, I probably will. :lol3: Unfortunately I have boss to answer to...

❝ ... A paper “On the Statistical Model of the Two-Stage Design in Bioequivalence Assessment” by Karalis/Macheras is currently under review (J Pharm Pharmacol). ...


Interesting. Thanks. I'll get it when it is published.

All the best,
Shuanghe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
54 visitors (0 registered, 54 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:32 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It’s always fun to have your models validated,
but is way more fun to have them trashed.
Finding out you are completely wrong
is a great part of science.    G. Randall Gladstone

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5