Validation of PowerTOST [Two-Stage / GS Designs]
Hi Karthik,
Hint:
Scroll down to the general references. For the “exact” method see
For validation of
You can also use the two example data sets of Potvin et al., though you have to use
Example 1, stage 1
Method B
Method C
Example 2, stage 1
Method B
Method C
both methods
a posteriori power of the pooled data set, both methods
Again: Don’t use Phoenix/WinNonlin, which reports after stage 1 for Method B (0.0294) power 93.4% (example 1) and 80.4% (example 2)…
If you want to cross-validate
❝ In PowerTOST actually what formula they used and how to validate PowerTOST from my end.
❝ According to my SOP I want to mention the formula so if possible pls share to me.
Hint:
library(PowerTOST)
help(PowerTOST)
Scroll down to the general references. For the “exact” method see
help(OwensQ)
. Background and formulas in{R-folder}/library/PowerTOST/doc/BE_power_sample_size_excerpt.pdf
.For validation of
sampleN.TOST()
see help(data2x2)
and the script test_2x2.R
in the /tests
-folder. This may serve as an indirect validation of power.TOST()
– which is repeatedly called within sampleN.TOST()
until the target power is reached.You can also use the two example data sets of Potvin et al., though you have to use
method='shifted'
in power.TOST()
– since they used the shifted central t-distribution in their simulations for speed reasons.library(PowerTOST)
n <- 12
m <- 'shifted'
a0 <- 0.05
a1 <- 0.0294
Example 1, stage 1
Method B
power Ntotal
Potvin 75.6 14
round(100*power.TOST(alpha=a1, CV=0.1456, n=n, method=m),1) 75.6
sampleN.TOST(alpha=a1, CV=0.1456, method=m) 14
Method C
power Ntotal
Potvin 84.1 NA
round(100*power.TOST(alpha=a0, CV=0.1456, n=n, method=m),1) 84.1
Example 2, stage 1
Method B
power Ntotal
Potvin 50.5 20
round(100*power.TOST(alpha=a1, CV=0.1821, n=n, method=m),1) 50.5
Method C
power Ntotal
Potvin 64.9 20
round(100*power.TOST(alpha=a0, CV=0.1821, n=n, method=m),1) 65.0
both methods
Ntotal
sampleN.TOST(alpha=a1, CV=0.1821, method=m) 20
a posteriori power of the pooled data set, both methods
power
Potvin 66.3
round(100*power.TOST(alpha=a1, CV=0.2167, n=20, method=m),1) 66.7
Again: Don’t use Phoenix/WinNonlin, which reports after stage 1 for Method B (0.0294) power 93.4% (example 1) and 80.4% (example 2)…
If you want to cross-validate
PowerTOST()
against commercial software (e.g., NQuery Advisor or PASS) use method='shifted'
for the latter because it employs the shifted central t-distribution instead of the exact method.—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Potvin’s 2-stage adaptive design GSD 2012-08-17 20:56
- Potvin’s 2-stage adaptive design + RSABE/ABEL Helmut 2012-08-18 00:39
- Potvin’s 2-stage adaptive design + RSABE/ABEL GSD 2012-08-31 16:30
- Tough job Helmut 2012-08-31 18:37
- Tough job GSD 2012-08-31 19:23
- C/D for EMA? Good luck! Helmut 2012-09-01 15:09
- Surprise? d_labes 2012-09-05 12:57
- Got it. Ages for sims to complete Helmut 2012-09-05 13:35
- Tough job GSD 2012-08-31 19:23
- Tough job Helmut 2012-08-31 18:37
- Power for Two stage Design K2K 2013-10-07 14:43
- Power for Two stage Design Helmut 2013-10-07 14:59
- Power for Two stage Design K2K 2013-10-08 14:35
- “Interim power” Helmut 2013-10-08 14:58
- “Interim power” K2K 2013-10-09 12:39
- Validation of PowerTOSTHelmut 2013-10-09 14:10
- Phoenix/WinNonlin - power d_labes 2013-10-09 16:11
- Phoenix/WinNonlin - power Helmut 2013-10-09 18:19
- power K2K 2013-10-10 08:36
- Phoenix/WinNonlin - power Helmut 2013-10-09 18:19
- “Interim power” K2K 2013-10-09 12:39
- “Interim power” Helmut 2013-10-08 14:58
- Power for Two stage Design K2K 2013-10-08 14:35
- Power for Two stage Design Helmut 2013-10-07 14:59
- Potvin’s 2-stage adaptive design + RSABE/ABEL GSD 2012-08-31 16:30
- Potvin’s 2-stage adaptive design + RSABE/ABEL Helmut 2012-08-18 00:39