annoying imbalance [Two-Stage / GS Designs]
Hi all,
Dammit.
I just tried to work out the equations for the various sums of squares. Imbalance on the sequence part (6 in stage 1, 2 in stage 2) implies that I can probably not derive a residual ss by means of a simple formula. Then the only option (at least for me) will be the matrix way forward and that will slow the whole thing considerably down. Might as well just set this up in R then?!?
Does anyone feel like wasting some days and nights on deriving a formulae for residual SS now that I admit algebraic defeat?
❝ – Sequence in Stage (with nesting; we could also just give them factor levels like 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 and observe that 1..6 apply to stage 1 and 7..8 apply in stage 2.
Dammit.

Does anyone feel like wasting some days and nights on deriving a formulae for residual SS now that I admit algebraic defeat?
—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Complete thread:
- Two-stage three-treatment BE study? Oiinkie 2013-07-22 16:03
- Bingo! Helmut 2013-07-22 16:33
- Bingo! Oiinkie 2013-07-29 10:41
- Bingo! Helmut 2013-07-29 11:32
- Bingo! ElMaestro 2013-07-29 12:06
- Terms in Anova ElMaestro 2013-07-29 16:50
- annoying imbalanceElMaestro 2013-07-29 22:37
- Bingo! Helmut 2013-07-29 11:32
- Bingo! jatkins_5 2014-10-30 03:53
- Yes, however... ElMaestro 2014-10-30 08:59
- Yes, however... jatkins_5 2014-10-31 23:20
- Yes, however... ElMaestro 2014-10-30 08:59
- Bingo! Oiinkie 2013-07-29 10:41
- Bingo! Helmut 2013-07-22 16:33