annoying imbalance [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2013-07-30 00:37 (4346 d 17:59 ago) – Posting: # 11120
Views: 9,938

Hi all,

❝ – Sequence in Stage (with nesting; we could also just give them factor levels like 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 and observe that 1..6 apply to stage 1 and 7..8 apply in stage 2.


Dammit.:crying: I just tried to work out the equations for the various sums of squares. Imbalance on the sequence part (6 in stage 1, 2 in stage 2) implies that I can probably not derive a residual ss by means of a simple formula. Then the only option (at least for me) will be the matrix way forward and that will slow the whole thing considerably down. Might as well just set this up in R then?!?

Does anyone feel like wasting some days and nights on deriving a formulae for residual SS now that I admit algebraic defeat?

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
19 visitors (0 registered, 19 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:36 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Reach for the stars,
even if you have to stand on a cactus.    Susan Longacre

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5