Bingo! [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-07-29 13:32 (4701 d 22:40 ago) – Posting: # 11099
Views: 11,635

Hi Oiinkie,

❝ To avoid the "too progressive" design of a two-stage three-treatment study, we will go for a three-treatment pilot and base our decision for the test formulation on this study.


Good idea. Given the strange responses I have seen in the recent past from European regulators even on straightforward two-stage designs I would not recommend such an approach – unless a framework is published. Nevertheless, a tempting idea which deserves some attention, IMHO.
(:waving: ElMaestro?)

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
107 visitors (0 registered, 107 guests [including 26 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:13 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking.    Stuart J. Pocock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5