Bingo! [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2013-07-29 13:32 (4282 d 01:57 ago) – Posting: # 11099
Views: 9,691

Hi Oiinkie,

❝ To avoid the "too progressive" design of a two-stage three-treatment study, we will go for a three-treatment pilot and base our decision for the test formulation on this study.


Good idea. Given the strange responses I have seen in the recent past from European regulators even on straightforward two-stage designs I would not recommend such an approach – unless a framework is published. Nevertheless, a tempting idea which deserves some attention, IMHO.
(:waving: ElMaestro?)

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,699 registered users;
25 visitors (0 registered, 25 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:30 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Do not put your faith in what statistics say until you have carefully
considered what they do not say.    William W. Watt

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5