ISO17025 is King [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2011-01-25 14:15 (5618 d 07:22 ago) – Posting: # 6488
Views: 28,253

Ahoy Ohlbe,

❝ True ! GCP make a clear difference between QC (monitoring) and QA (auditing), but there is nothing about QC in GLP.


<rant>

And while we are at it:
It is incomprehensible why traceability plays such a minor role in the GLP document.
Furthermore, to be honest ISO17025 is a much much better document as criteria for bioanalytics than GLP. I think the regulators should eliminate the GLP sentence from the EU BE guideline and mention ISO17025 in stead.

</rant>

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
106 visitors (0 registered, 106 guests [including 23 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:37 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To propose that poor design can be corrected by subtle analysis techniques
is contrary to good scientific thinking.    Stuart J. Pocock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5