IP accountability [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2010-03-01 13:07 (5550 d 10:11 ago) – Posting: # 4838
Views: 4,782

Dear Raghavendra,

Once again it depends on the question...

If the answer is absolutely needed before you can administer the product to the subjects (for instance the expiry date), then telling the sponsor no answer would result in postponing the trial usually helps to get a fast answer.

Whether you can already dispense/package the IMP depends on its primary packaging and on how you do the packaging yourself, I would say. If it is in a large bottle, or if you remove it from its blister: this is usually done on the day before dosing, for stability reasons. So if you're not sure to be able to dose, doing the dispensing/packaging may be a problem. If the IMP remains in its blister, then no problem to do the dispensing/packaging in advance.

Regards
Ohlbe

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
141 visitors (0 registered, 141 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:18 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Lack of clarity is always a sign of dishonesty.    Celia Green

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5