Sponsor approval of a protocol [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by ray_be  – India, 2010-02-04 19:21 (5975 d 18:21 ago) – Posting: # 4709
Views: 6,080

(edited on 2010-02-04 21:56)

Dear Debbie,

❝ ❝ can a sponsor approve a protocol before investigators approval (principal,

❝ ❝ clinical investigator etc.)?


Yes, if sponsor is responsible for the protocol developement, which is more common in Phase II - IV studies.

Dear Ohlbe,

❝ Why not ? The investigator and the sponsor should both sign the protocol,

❝ but there is no order specified in GCP. I would even say that in Phase II

❝ - IV studies the sponsor usually signs before the investigators. The

❝ situation is often different in BE trials when the protocol is written

❝ by a CRO and not directly by the sponsor, but I am not aware of any

❝ restriction in GCP.


IMHO, logically speaking it is not very satisfactory for a BE study protocol, if the protocol is prepared by a CRO and all the investigators viz. principal, clinical, bioanalytical, statistical and pharmacokinetics are from CRO side. Because unless they give their consent on the protocol i.e. approval by signing, how come the sponsor will come to know whether the protocol is a final one or not?

Regards

Ray.

--
Edit: quotation marks restored [Ohlbe]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
165 visitors (0 registered, 165 guests [including 35 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:43 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Always listen to experts.
They’ll tell you what can’t be done and why.
Then do it.    Robert A. Heinlein

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5