Protocol Deviation [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by boonchai_l – Thailand, 2009-09-28 08:37 (6103 d 21:42 ago) – Posting: # 4257
Views: 8,921

Dear HS,

❝ I agree with all points Ohlbe made. I think Mr. Statistician is a little

❝ bit overreacting. The decision whether a protocol deviation is minor or

❝ major is not his business.


Ummmm.., I don't know it is my business, or not? I just give my opinion to everyone in meeting whether please caution about bias. Previously, one person in the meeting answered QA's question about that subject "why don't we drop him out after bio analysis? when his plasma concentration is irregular from another period because that shows laying down effect to plasma concentration". I had realized already that I don't have right to judge which deviation is minor or major but in this case I have to give opinion. I don't concern what is protocol deviation because that is QA duty. I give opinion because I only don't want to let it go without discussion concerning bias. But my opinion support QA.

Regards,
Boonchai L. (Mr.Statistician)

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
134 visitors (0 registered, 134 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:20 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The idea is to try and give all the information to help others
to judge the value of your contribution;
not just the information that leads to judgment
in one particular direction or another.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5