Source Document: certified copies [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by Preet – 2009-03-19 09:22 (5953 d 12:11 ago) – Posting: # 3378
Views: 8,560

Dear All,

Please guide me on the above issue. Is it necessary to take signatures on the photocopy of source document for documentation purpose? (as we require to share few forms (from CRF)/documents with another department of CRO).

e.g.
1. We are sharing sampling time point deviation form with Biostatistician. In clinical department we are maintaining original copy and photocopy will be shared by statistical department. As per our current practice this photocopy is not certified (attested) by clinical department.

According to ICH GCP E6 guidelines. section 1 Glossary;
1.51 Source Data: All information in original records and certified copies of original records of clinical findings, observations, or other activities in a clinical trial necessary for the reconstruction and evaluation of the trial. Source data are contained in source documents (original records or certified copies).

Now my question is, Do we need to take signatures on the photocopy of Sampling time point deviations intended for stat documentation process?

Warm Regards,
Preet

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,677 registered users;
36 visitors (0 registered, 36 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:34 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Many people tend to look at programming styles and languages like religions:
if you belong to one, you cannot belong to others.
But this analogy is another fallacy.    Niklaus Wirth

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5