Source Document: certified copies [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by Preet – 2009-03-19 09:22 (6302 d 17:22 ago) – Posting: # 3378
Views: 10,328

Dear All,

Please guide me on the above issue. Is it necessary to take signatures on the photocopy of source document for documentation purpose? (as we require to share few forms (from CRF)/documents with another department of CRO).

e.g.
1. We are sharing sampling time point deviation form with Biostatistician. In clinical department we are maintaining original copy and photocopy will be shared by statistical department. As per our current practice this photocopy is not certified (attested) by clinical department.

According to ICH GCP E6 guidelines. section 1 Glossary;
1.51 Source Data: All information in original records and certified copies of original records of clinical findings, observations, or other activities in a clinical trial necessary for the reconstruction and evaluation of the trial. Source data are contained in source documents (original records or certified copies).

Now my question is, Do we need to take signatures on the photocopy of Sampling time point deviations intended for stat documentation process?

Warm Regards,
Preet

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
147 visitors (0 registered, 147 guests [including 28 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:45 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is simply common sense at its best that is,
rigidly accurate in observation, and
merciless to fallacy in logic.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5